Following a review by Caulfield and Rachul, appearing in Canada, which dismisses homeopathy, Christopher Johnson, ND, wrote to The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine to give a longer term perspective and explains how, historically, there has been a series of misguided and poorly argued attacks against homeopathy. He shows how all the ‘high quality, positive data’ on the efficacy of homeopathy is suppressed – or ignored – in order to discredit it. The review, says, Johnson, “cites weak, biased, negative data” whilst ignoring all the high quality, positive research data proving its positive effects

To read the letter, published in April 2012, please click here.